Is Newt a Conservative? Look Before You Leap

by Kevin “Coach” Collins

Besides his stunning leap in yesterday’s Rasmussen Iowa poll, Newt Gingrich is surging in a few national polls and sagging badly in at least one Iowa poll. What the final numbers will show in Iowa remains to be seen.

Nevertheless, aside from his “paper serving” episode with one of his ex-wives, there are a few additional very important items in Gingrich’s past – some not very far back – that demand a closer look.

Gingrich has been tagged by Willard Romney as the inspiration for RomneyCare and eventually ObamaCare’s requirement for a individual health care mandate which would require all of us to march lockstep into the clutches of a gray, faceless socialist health care system. In his 2008 book Real Change, Gingrich wrote   “Finally, we should insist that everyone above a certain level buy [health-care] coverage [or, if they are opposed to insurance, post a bond].” Post a bond? Really, Mr. Gingrich? And just who would hold the bond money, the federal government?

Gingrich supports a “partial amnesty.” He would accept a “partial amnesty for illegal aliens” to help them game our system. He seems to rely on the liberal’s favorite way to justify destroying our legal system – the old tried and true sob story citing the “plight” of a 19 year old illegal brought here at 3 years old. By his logic there are very few laws that could not be repealed. Mr. Gingrich a “partial amnesty” is like being “partially pregnant” or “partially dead” — it just doesn’t exist.

Despite his kind of, sort of, opposition to TARP before he supported it, he warned us that it was a recipe for, “crony capitalism and the appearance of — if not the actual existence of — corruption.” Why support it then, Mr. Gingrich?

In 1987 Gingrich co-sponsored a bill to bring back the Fairness Doctrine which would have destroyed conservative Talk Radio and Television shows.

Reminding us that being well thought of is still more important than conservative principles Gingrich said, “We do agree our country must take action to address climate change,” while sitting on a sofa with Nancy Pelosi.

In Ma,y Gingrich not only rejected Paul Ryan’s plan for saving Medicare, but said, “I don’t think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering.” When Gingrich asked about his comments, he lied and denied he was talking about Ryan’s plan. To prove it had nothing to do with Paul Ryan’s plan, he apologized to him as any squishy Washington Beltway politician would.

Anyone who thinks Gingrich will be a president who will help restore the power of states as designed by the Tenth Amendment ought to think again. In a Gingrich White House the power over our lives will continue to be sucked up by the voracious appetite of an ever growing federal government. No amount of “right wing social engineering” will save us from a big government fan like Newt Gingrich.

To contact your Congressional representative, use this link:

To read more use this link:

This article originally appeared on and is reprinted with permission.

About Kevin "Coach" Collins

Dr. Kevin “Coach” Collins, a member of American Mensa and the Sons of the American Revolution, holds a doctoral degree in Public Administration from Nova Southeastern University, and brings a unique background to his endeavors. He is a Viet Nam era Marine and a retired NYPD Honor Legion street cop, who was assigned to many sensitive positions during his time with the Department. He blogs at
This entry was posted in Floyd Reports, News Reports, Opinion. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Is Newt a Conservative? Look Before You Leap

  1. Juggernauzt says:

    ROFL, I’ll take Newt over Mitt “MilqueToast” Romney any day. Newt may have made mistakes in his past but his record as Speaker of the House proves Newt is more conservative than you care to give him credit for. Stop wasting our time with the “small stuff” and focus on the fiscal issues that actually matter. Fiscal gets results than Obama and Bush did not, fiscal solves real problems, who really gives a crap about the whiny small stuff, jeesE. Without Newt, Clinton would have spent far far more and you know it.

    Also, stop taking Newt’s words out of context, “right wing social engineering” wasn’t meant for congressman Paul Ryan because Newt actually worked with Ryan on healthcare solutions at his foundation as well the 2 have discussed HC many times over the years. The statement was rigged with media spin doctering………………… were suckered by liberal media editing………….makes you less conservative than me and it also makes you either a sheeple or a sucker who is easily hoodwinked by left wing media social engineering, BOOOYA!!!

    None of the candidates are perfect but clearly Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are better choices than Mitt “MilqueToast” Romney.

    Juggernauzt @ Twitter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>